Just war essay

Just war essay

 · The just war doctrine states “strict conditions” must be met by the “military force” to engage in war, and these conditions must be taken in “rigorous consideration. There are 4 conditions: a just war must be a last resort, meaning, all other peaceful options must be considered before force is taken. These means must be shown to be “impractical or ineffective.” Just War Theory Essay. Words15 Pages. Just War Theory. Price reduced due to problems with format. One of the perennial realities of human existence is war. From the earliest recorded events of human history all the way through to modern times, human communities have engaged in armed conflict as a method of dispute resolution  · Just war theory is the most prominent standpoint on peace and war ethics. The theory deals with the right to resort to war and proper conduct of war. This policy equips international policy makers with accurate criteria to use to allow them evaluate the morality of interventions of specific arms of the military

Just War Theory Essays: Examples, Topics, Titles, & Outlines

Just war theory is a body of principles developed over centuries that attempt to delineate what justifies the initiation of armed conflict and what rules govern the subsequent conduct of fighting.

The contemporary dominant strand of the concept developed from the Western, Judeo-Christian canon, but non-Western philosophies, just war essay, including Hinduism and Islam, also have rich just war traditions, just war essay. The main rival philosophies to just war theory are pacifism and political realism. The main tenets of just war theory have been incorporated into international law and custom and are enshrined in various key documents such as the United Nations Charter. The Latin phrase jus ad bellum justice toward war is generally used to describe the criteria by which a state has a legal or moral right to resort to force.

In the Western tradition, six factors were necessary for the instigation of a just war. First, war could only be waged by a recognized, legitimate, sovereign political authority.

Key to this principle was the notion that only the highest political actor, whether it is a sovereign or just war essay elected or appointed body, had a legal monopoly on the use of force. Consequently, substate actors could not legitimately resort to force as a private initiative or venture because such actions would undermine the stability of society and the international system.

Second, war should only be undertaken for the right goals. Conflicts were not to be initiated because of greed or revenge or antagonism.

Instead, the ultimate goal of the use of force was to restore peace. Third, there had to be just cause, just war essay. Just cause has historically manifested itself in one of three ways: defense against attack, the reclamation of territory or property unlawfully just war essay, or to combat a recognized evil or danger to the international system. Fourth, war must be the last resort after all other options have been exhausted. Fifth, the destruction of war must not outweigh the potential just war essay of the conflict.

Sixth, and finally, conflicts should be initiated only if there is a reasonable expectation that a lasting peace may be achieved. Jus in bello justice in war describes the rules of war once a conflict has begun and is based on two main tenets. Proportionality requires that combatants only use appropriate force to achieve their objectives and avoid gratuitous violence or destruction of property. Discrimination obliges belligerents to avoid direct attacks on civilians or other noncombatants.

Instead, combatants should employ all necessary and proper steps to protect noncombatants from violence. The theologian St. Augustine is generally credited with just war essay the first extensive effort at just war theory, which included a prohibition against warfare based on hatred or greed, developed in works such as Against Faustus. Augustine also argued for the importance of legitimate authority in initiating conflict to maintain order, as well as the need to limit conflict.

Thomas Aquinas codified what became the basis for contemporary just war theory in his work the Summa Theologicae, including the main tenets of jus ad bellum and jus in bello. Nonetheless, wars of conquest and religious conversion became common during the medieval period. Later contributors to just war theory included Hugo Grotius, John Locke, Immanuel Kant, and, in the contemporary period, political philosopher Michael Walzer, whose Just and Unjust Wars develops a secular form of just war theory.

Walzer discounts pacifism, but stresses the importance of ethical behavior in the conduct of war. Both Hinduism and Islam developed a form of just war theory that emphasizes the importance of stability and the protection of just war essay social unit from external threat. Ancient Hindu philosophy argued that leaders had not only a right to defend their people from internal and external threat, but also both a moral and religious duty to do so.

Under Hindu custom, justifiable wars included those to expel foreign invaders, disputes over territory, and conflicts in response to affronts to royal power. Nonetheless, as with Western just war theory, just war essay, war should be the last resort. Sacred Hindu texts also endorsed discrimination and the protection of noncombatants and the principle of proportionality in the use of force. In the twentieth century, nonviolence became increasingly important through the advocacy of Mohandas Gandhi.

As with Christianity and Hinduism, Islamic tradition accepts that force may be needed to preserve order and to ensure the triumph of good over evil. The main justification for the use of force just war essay to protect the community from external threat. However, some Sunni scholars also justified conflict that spread Islam. Typically, secular conflicts to expand territory or gain wealth were not considered just.

Under other branches of Islam, the use of force is acceptable only in defensive wars. Buddhism typically rejects warfare and emphasizes nonviolence. However, under some circumstances, force may be justifiable, such as when it is used to protect innocents from evil.

However, even when force is used, peace and the restoration of stability remain paramount. Under just war theory, preemptive war is acceptable only if an attack is imminent and all other efforts to resolve a conflict have been exhausted.

Preemptive wars are distinct from preventive wars, which are waged to overcome a pending threat, but one that is not necessarily imminent. Preventive wars are generally held to be illegal under modern just war theory. The invasion of Iraq was criticized under the just war doctrine as a preventive war, just war essay. This example Just War Theory Essay is published for educational and informational purposes only.

If you need a custom essay or research paper on this topic please use our writing services. com offers reliable custom essay writing services that can help you to receive high grades and impress your professors with the quality of each essay or research paper you hand in.

Essay Examples. Political Science Just war essay Examples, just war essay. ORDER HIGH QUALITY CUSTOM PAPER Always on-time. FREE INQUIRY. ORDER NOW, just war essay. Special offer!

Promo code: cd1a Related Posts.

Michael Walzer on Just War Theory - Big Think

, time: 4:59

Just War Theory Essay - Words

 · Citing national security protocol, safeguarding civilian life and forestall another terrorist strike in the wake of 9 / 11, Jean Bethke Elshtain wrote that the fight against terrorism waged by the Bush regime against the Middle Eastern perpetrators and their allies qualifies as just war. hile the claim that waging retaliatory war deterred recurrence is a reasonable one, the manner in which the U.S. went about it defied the Jus in bello principle of just war  · Just war theory is the most prominent standpoint on peace and war ethics. The theory deals with the right to resort to war and proper conduct of war. This policy equips international policy makers with accurate criteria to use to allow them evaluate the morality of interventions of specific arms of the military  · The just war doctrine states “strict conditions” must be met by the “military force” to engage in war, and these conditions must be taken in “rigorous consideration. There are 4 conditions: a just war must be a last resort, meaning, all other peaceful options must be considered before force is taken. These means must be shown to be “impractical or ineffective.”